Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia
Personal Coach
Client
Pulkit Chhabra
Phase 1 · Week 3.2 Saturday, 27 June 2026
— SESSION
16
Sets Logged
4 exercises × 4 sets
~11.5
Sets to Failure / Near
~72% — pulled down by Ex. 1
1 of 4
Exercises Form-Confirmed
Seated row only
60.5kg
Bodyweight
Reference for loading
Today's Target Muscles — Pull Day (Back + Biceps)
💪
Latissimus Dorsi
Primary — Lat Pulldown
🏋️
Rhomboids / Mid-Trap
Primary — Seated Row
💪
Biceps Brachii
Primary — Both Curls
🔵
Brachialis / Brachioradialis
Secondary — Curls
🔵
Rear Deltoid
Secondary — Row + Pulldown
🔵
Forearm Flexors
Grip — All sets
🔥
Warm-up
Standard warm-up completed. New gym environment — a few extra light reps on the lat pulldown setup specifically would have been useful to get a feel for the improvised rig before loading it, see Exercise 1 below.
✓ Done
Session Log · 27 June
1
Lat Pulldown — Improvised Dual-Pulley Bar Setup
4 sets · 35kg → 40kg → 40kg → 35kg · Form broke down on set 3 before true failure
Needs Work ▾
Primary: Latissimus Dorsi Secondary: Biceps BrachiiRear DeltoidRhomboids
Sets logged — no proper lat pulldown station available; bar connected to two separate cable pulleys, each side loaded to half the intended weight
SetTensionRepsTimeStatus
135 kg13~60sHard by the end — reasonable opener given unfamiliar equipment
240 kg7 full + 2 partial~51sNear failure ✓
340 kg~4~47s⚠ Form broke down before failure — stopped because the position got hard to hold, not because the muscle gave out
435 kg (dropped)7 full + 2 partial~48sReasonable set after the weight correction, but this should have been the working weight from set 2
Form Analysis
New Equipment, Not New Form
This wasn't a technique breakdown in the usual sense — it's an equipment problem. A real lat pulldown station has one fixed pulley directly overhead and a stable bar path. Rigging a bar between two separate cable pulleys changes how the bar moves and balances through the rep, which makes it genuinely harder to control at higher weight, especially the first time using that setup. That's exactly what happened at 40kg on set 3.
Stopping Before Failure
This is the part that matters most: on the video, set 3 stops because holding the position got difficult — not because the lats hit genuine failure. That's a different thing from a hard set, and it's the one to be honest about going forward. The muscle had more in it; the unfamiliar bar path is what ended the set early.
Practical Fix for Next Time at an Unfamiliar Setup
When the equipment itself is improvised like this, a reasonable adjustment is to drop the starting weight by 15–20% below the usual fixed-pulldown number and spend the first set purely on feeling out the bar path, before chasing failure. That would likely have meant starting around 30–32kg today rather than 35kg.
Grip
The neutral grip habit from previous sessions isn't the issue here — grip and pull path were fine when the bar was controllable. The instability was specific to the rigged dual-pulley setup, not a step backward in technique.
💬
Coach Manmeet: "This was a bit off, and I think it's because it was a new gym and you didn't adapt well to the rigged-up machine. I could see in the video that you were giving up in between rather than the muscle actually failing. Let's tighten this up next week — same protocol, just with a more conservative starting weight until the equipment feels familiar."
2
Seated Cable Row
4 sets · 30kg throughout · Near-failure sets 1–2, failure sets 3–4
2 Refinements ▾
Primary: Rhomboids / Mid-TrapeziusLatissimus Dorsi Secondary: Rear DeltoidBiceps BrachiiForearm Flexors
Sets logged — same dual-pulley cable setup as Exercise 1
SetTensionRepsTimeStatus
130 kg9~58sNear failure ✓
230 kg10.5~58sAlmost failure ✓ — consistent with set 1
330 kg9.5~49sFailure ✓
430 kg7.5~46sFailure ✓ — clean finish, rep count dropping at the same weight is exactly the expected fatigue pattern
Form Analysis
Overall Execution
Confirmed correct — this exercise held up well on the same improvised setup that gave the lat pulldown trouble, which says something about how solid the underlying row technique already is.
Elbow Path — Tuck Further
Pull the elbows back tighter to the sides through the row, rather than letting them drift outward. A tighter elbow path shifts more of the work onto the lats and mid-back instead of the rear delts, which is where this pull should be felt most.
Torso Stability — Less Swing
A small hip-hinge to initiate the pull is fine, but using the torso to swing the weight back turns part of this into momentum rather than back-muscle work — and it reduces how much tension the lats and rhomboids actually take on. Keep the torso close to vertical through the pull.
💬
Coach Manmeet: "Seated cable row was correct. Two things to tighten: tuck the elbows in even more, and cut down on the body swing — you're using a bit too much momentum from the torso instead of pulling with the back."
3
Cable Bicep Curl — Bent/Uneven Bar
4 sets · 15kg → 15kg → 15kg (after a failed 17.5kg attempt) → 15kg · Failure sets 3 & 4
Needs Work ▾
Primary: Biceps Brachii Secondary: BrachialisBrachioradialisForearm Flexors
Sets logged — bar attachment was bent/uneven, not a straight bar
SetTensionRepsTimeStatus
115 kg12~60sHard by the end
215 kg12~60sNear failure ✓
317.5kg attempted → 15 kg12~57sFailure ✓ — good call dropping back immediately rather than forcing bad reps at 17.5kg
415 kg9.5~57sFull failure ✓
Form Analysis
Equipment Note
A bent or uneven bar genuinely changes the angle of pull slightly from side to side — worth flagging to the gym, and worth dropping the working weight a touch until a straight bar is available, since the awkward bar adds a small stability tax on top of the lift itself.
Upper Arm Drifting
This is the real issue, and it shows clearly on the video: the upper arm isn't staying pinned to the torso through the rep — it's drifting forward as the weight comes up. Once the elbow drifts forward, the front delts and a bit of body momentum start sharing the load that should be entirely on the biceps. The fix is keeping the upper arm locked against the side from the first rep to the last.
Restarting a Broken Set
The video also shows a set stopping mid-way and starting again. Once a set breaks like that, the continuous tension that's actually driving the muscle toward failure is lost — restarting doesn't recover that, it just adds reps without the same training effect. If a set has to be paused, it's better counted as ended there rather than restarted.
Range of Motion
Worth noting as a genuine improvement: the top-of-rep range of motion that was flagged as an issue several weeks ago is no longer showing up as a problem today. That fix has held.
💬
Coach Manmeet: "Cable bicep curl was correct in the basics, but you're not keeping the upper portion of your arm constant on the way up — I saw it drift in the video. I also saw you stop and start the set again partway through. Let's lock the upper arm in place and, if a set has to break, treat it as over rather than restarting it."
4
Incline Bench Seated Dumbbell Bicep Curl
4 sets · 6kg → 8kg → 10kg → 10kg · Failure sets 3 & 4, near-failure set 2
Camera Angle Limited ▾
Primary: Biceps Brachii (long head, incline stretch) Secondary: BrachialisBrachioradialis
Sets logged — Time-based method (40–60s window)
SetWeightRepsTimeStatus
16 kg13~60sHard by the end, not near failure
28 kg13~60sNear failure ✓
310 kg10~60sFailure ✓ — clean progressive jump
410 kg6~47sTotal failure ✓
Form Analysis
Bench Position
Confirmed correct from what's visible — incline angle and seated position look right.
Upper Arm Position — Can't Confirm
Honest call here: the camera angle in this video doesn't show the upper arm clearly enough to confirm whether it's hanging straight and staying still through the curl, which is the detail that actually matters most on this exercise. Need a side-on angle next time to actually check it, rather than guessing.
Why the Incline Angle Matters
One thing worth keeping in mind on this exercise specifically: the incline position stretches the long head of the biceps more than a standing curl does, because the arm hangs slightly behind the body rather than straight down. That extra stretch is a real mechanical advantage for this variation — worth keeping in the rotation even once the camera angle issue is sorted.
💬
Coach Manmeet: "Position is correct on this one. I genuinely couldn't tell from the camera angle whether the upper arm was staying where it should — next time, film this one from the side so I can actually check it instead of guessing."
Training Review · Against the 22 May DEXA Baseline
Is the Training Side On Track for What the DEXA Actually Flagged?
The DEXA baseline didn't just say "build muscle" in the abstract — it flagged a specific, measurable issue: ALMI of 6.99 kg/m² (low appendicular lean mass relative to height, the sarcopenia-risk marker) and overall lean mass of 42.4kg against a body fat of 26%. That's the target the whole training program needs to be judged against, not just "did the workout feel hard."
6.99 kg/m²
ALMI, 22 May
Below threshold — sarcopenia risk flag
42.4 kg
Lean Mass, 22 May
Baseline to build from
3×/week
Current Training Frequency
Push/Pull/Legs rotation
~12
Days to Week 4 Check-in
Phase 1 halfway point
The Direct Answer
Yes, the training structure matches what the DEXA calls for. Execution on isolation work is the gap, not the program.
Low ALMI in a young adult isn't treated any differently than it would be in an older adult for the purpose of choosing an intervention — resistance training, applied consistently with progressive overload and genuine effort near failure, is the correct and really the only well-evidenced way to add lean mass at any age. The standard guidance for hypertrophy-focused training is roughly 2–3 sessions per muscle group per week, with sets taken to or near failure for the mechanical tension that actually drives growth. A 3-day Push/Pull/Legs week with time-based, failure-oriented sets is exactly that structure — nothing about the plan itself needs to change.

Where the last two sessions (today and Jun 25) actually show gaps is execution, and it's the same shape of gap on both days: compound movements are landing well, isolation movements are where the inconsistency shows up. Tricep pushdown and seated cable row — both confirmed correct — happen to also be the two cleanest, most "locked-in" movements technically. Cable flies, overhead extension, and cable curl — all three with a specific fix flagged — are also the three most technique-sensitive isolation movements on the sheet. That's not a coincidence: isolation work has a much smaller margin for error, and it's also where it's hardest to self-judge genuine failure versus just "it got hard."

The lat pulldown miss today is a one-off equipment problem, not a trend — it shouldn't be read as a step backward.
What's Genuinely On Track
✅
Training frequency and structure match the evidence-based response to the DEXA's ALMI flag. No redesign needed.
✅
The time-based, near-failure protocol is being applied for real — 11 of 16 sets on Jun 25 and roughly the same proportion today reached genuine failure or close to it, with partial reps counted properly.
✅
Progressive overload within sessions is consistently showing up — every single exercise across both days has a real weight increase from set 1 to the working sets, not flat loading.
What Actually Needs Attention
📝
Isolation-movement form is the recurring soft spot — chest flies, overhead extension, and cable curl all needed a specific fix across the last two sessions, while every compound movement either passed clean or had an equipment-specific excuse.
📝
Self-judging "failure" on isolation work is harder than on compounds — today's cable curl restart and the lat pulldown stopping early both show the same underlying pattern: it's easier to know a compound lift is done than an isolation one.
Next Steps — Training
01Keep the 3-day Push/Pull/Legs structure exactly as is. The DEXA-driven case for it is solid and nothing in the last two sessions suggests changing frequency or split.
02On isolation movements specifically, slow down and check form mid-set, not just at the end. A 1-rep form check at rep 5–6 would likely catch the upper-arm drift on cable curls before it becomes the whole set's problem.
03At a new or unfamiliar gym, treat set 1 of any improvised-equipment exercise as a feel-out set, not a working set. Today's lat pulldown would likely have gone better starting around 30kg and ramping from there.
04Film isolation exercises from the side where possible — both this session's incline curl and the ongoing cable curl upper-arm question would be much easier to verify with a side-on angle instead of front-on.
05Week 4 (Phase 1 halfway point, ~12 days out) is still the right moment for a body-composition check-in against the 22 May DEXA — specifically lean mass and ALMI, to see whether 4 weeks of this training volume is moving the number that actually matters.
"The program is right — three sessions a week, real progressive overload, genuine effort near failure on most sets. What separates a good session from a great one right now isn't the plan, it's whether the last 10% of an isolation movement gets the same attention as the first 90%. That's a coachable, fixable gap, not a structural one." — Coach Manmeet